866 euros, one sale. The mandate I would not take again.

In 2024 I ran marketing for Zani Paris, a supplements brand sold online in dropshipping, alone in the role. On the only month that was properly measured, from 30 August to 27 September, the brand spent 866 euros on media and made one sale, for 40.64 euros.
I keep this file because I think it is the most useful failure I have, and because the numbers in it are clean.
The numbers, as they are
23,592 impressions. 176 landing page views. 9 add-to-carts. 3 checkouts started. 1 sale. A return on ad spend of zero, against a target of 2.
The funnel lost 99.25 % of its volume between the impression and the page view. The problem was not the checkout. It was upstream of the shop.
What I would still defend
I questioned the brief I had been given. Six weeks in, I wrote a repositioning note that opened on my own mistake: we were producing means before knowing the strategy. In it I named the two levers the brand did not control. The price, set by the supplier. And distribution, imposed by the dropshipping model.
I built the media model on observed rates, not comfortable ones. It showed a break-even click-through rate of 6.75 % against 0.93 % observed, a factor of 7.3, and a gap between spend and revenue that stayed negative every month from October to April. I handed it over with its own proof that it did not close.
I kept the reports that embarrassed everyone. Two reports from the acquisition agency announced spectacular returns. They were the tool's demonstration data: the ad account connection was broken and the dashboard fell back on its examples. I archived them with that explanation.
What I got wrong
I accepted a marketing leadership role on a quarter of marketing. Price and distribution were out of my hands from the first day. I knew it, I wrote it, and I stayed.
I diagnosed after producing. Content, site and influencers left before the target was settled. My June note denounces exactly the error I had made in May.
I read a month of reports before checking the instrumentation. A watermark on the first page was enough to see it.
The target changed without a written decision. A man in the first content calendar, a woman over 45 in the second. Nobody settled it, me included.
The rule I kept
Since then, I only take mandates where I hold the levers that decide the result: the price, the distribution, the budget. When I cannot hold them, I say so before the start, and I propose a different scope instead of a bigger campaign.
That rule is now the first of the five clauses I write into a contract.
Going further: a low CPM is a red flag, and when growth stalls.
Does your marketing head hold the levers you judge them on? Request a Growth Audit
A budget is not a P&L. Say which one you are handing over.
Four of my own mandates sorted without flattery, and the five clauses to write before the start.
ReadThe country manager who told me my campaign would not work. She was right.
A group campaign built on a daily price, a manager who said no before launch, and what changed after.
ReadElectric motorbikes on credit: the warning comes every day, not every quarter
113 electric motorbikes, 94 % repayment, and the daily signal that came before the default.
ReadWhen your customer owes you money, marketing changes its metric
Wiring a marketing system to the repayment rate, and what three failed pilots out of four taught.
Read